Journal of Computer Science and Technology  2010, 25(1) 42-52 DOI:     ISSN: 1000-9000 CN: CN 11-2296/TP

Current Issue | Archive | Search                                                            [Print]   [Close]
Survey
Information and Service
This Article
Supporting info
PDF(355KB)
Reference
Service and feedback
Email this article to a colleague
Add to my bookshell
Add to citation manager
Cite this article
Email Alert
Feedback
View Feedback
Keywords
algorithm
comparative genomics
computational biology
genome rearrangement
ortholog assignment
Authors
Tao Jiang

Some Algorithmic Challenges in Genome-Wide Ortholog Assignment

Tao Jiang (姜涛), Fellow, ACM

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, U.S.A.
School of Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Abstract

Genome-scale assignment of orthologous genes is a fundamental and challenging problem in computational biology and has a wide range of applications in comparative genomics, functional genomics, and systems biology. Many methods based on sequence similarity, phylogenetic analysis, chromosomal syntenic information, and genome rearrangement have been proposed in recent years for ortholog assignment. Although these methods produce results that largely agree with each other, their results may still contain significant differences. In this article, we consider the recently proposed parsimony approach for assigning orthologs between closely related genomes based on genome rearrangement, which essentially attempts to transform one genome into another by the smallest number of genome rearrangement events including reversal, translocation, fusion, and fission, as well as gene duplication events. We will highlight some of the challenging algorithmic problems that arise in the approach including (i) minimum common substring partition, (ii) signed reversal distance with duplicates, and (iii) signed transposition distance with duplicates. The most recent progress towards the solution of these problems will be reviewed and some open questions will be posed. We will also discuss some possible extensions of the approach to the simultaneous comparison of multiple genomes.

Keywords algorithm    comparative genomics    computational biology    genome rearrangement    ortholog assignment  
Received: 2009-09-01 Accepted: 2009-10-21 Online:  
DOI:
Fund:

This work is supported by the NSF of USA under Grant No. IIS-0711129.

Email: jiang@cs.ucr.edu
About author(s):
Tao Jiang received the B.S. degree in computer science and technology from the University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, in July 1984 and Ph.D. degree in computer science from University of Minnesota in Nov. 1988. He was a faculty member at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada during Jan. 1989~July 2001 and is now professor of computer science and engineering at University of California --- Riverside (UCR). He is also a member of the UCR Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, a member of the Center for Plant Cell Biology, a principal scientist at Shanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, and Changjiang Visiting Professor at Tsinghua University. Tao Jiang's recent research interest includes combinatorial algorithms, computational molecular biology, bioinformatics, and computational aspects of information retrieval. He is a fellow of ACM and of AAAS. More information about his work can be found at http://www1.cs.ucr.edu/~jiang.

Other similar articles
1.Sriparna Saha, Student Member, IEEE, and Sanghamitra Bandyopadhyay, Senior Member, IEEE.A New Line Symmetry Distance and Its Application to Data Clustering[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2009,24(3): 544-556
2.Lu Weifeng; Zhang Yuping;.Experimental Study on Strategy of CombiningSAT Algorithms[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 1998,13(6): 608-614
3.LUAN Shangmin; LI wei;.An Incremental Approach toAutomatic Algorithm Design[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 1999,14(4): 314-319
4.Wei Wei and Qing-Ji Zeng.Integrated Differentiated Survivability in IP over WDM Networks[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2004,19(6): 0-0
5.LI Xiaoli(李晓黎)and SHI Zhongzhi(史忠植).Innovating Web Page Classification Through Reducing Noise[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2002,17(1): 0-0
6.HE Simin; ZHANG Bo;.Solving SAT by Algorithm Transform of Wu s Method[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 1999,14(5): 468-480
7.Xue Jinyun;.Unified Approach for Developing EfficientAlgorithmic Programs[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 1997,12(4): 314-329
8.Xue Jinyun;.Formal Derivation of Graph AlgorithmicPrograms Using Partition-and-Recur[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 1998,13(6): 553-561
9.Lu Jian; Xu Jiafu;.Design Rationale for a Wide Spectrum Specification Language FGSPEC[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 1993,8(2): 42-50
10.Xue Jinyun;.Two New Strategies for Developing Loop Invariants and Their Applications[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 1993,8(2): 51-58
11.Jun He and Xin Yao.Time Complexity Analysis of an Evolutionary Algorithm for Finding Nearly Maximum Cardinality Matching[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2004,19(4): 0-0
12.Zi-Mao Li, Da-Ming Zhu, and Shao-Han Ma.Approximation Algorithm for Bottleneck Steiner Tree Problem in the Euclidean Plane[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2004,19(6): 0-0
13.Hong-Jie Dai, Yen-Ching Chang, Richard Tzong-Han Tsai, and Wen-Lian Hsu, Fellow, IEEE.New Challenges for Biological Text-Mining in the Next Decade[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2010,25(1): 169-inside back cover
14.David Sankoff, Chunfang Zheng, Adriana Muñoz, Zhenyu Yang, Zaky Adam, Robert Warren, Vicky Choi, and Qian Zhu.Issues in the Reconstruction of Gene Order Evolution[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2010,25(1): 10-25

Copyright 2008 by Journal of Computer Science and Technology