Journal of Computer Science and Technology  2010, 25(1) 95-106 DOI:     ISSN: 1000-9000 CN: CN 11-2296/TP

Current Issue | Archive | Search                                                            [Print]   [Close]
Survey
Information and Service
This Article
Supporting info
PDF(404KB)
Reference
Service and feedback
Email this article to a colleague
Add to my bookshell
Add to citation manager
Cite this article
Email Alert
Feedback
View Feedback
Keywords
automated NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance)
protein structure determination
algorithms
Authors
Ming Li

Can We Determine a Protein Structure Quickly?

Ming Li (李明), Fellow, ACM, IEEE, Royal Society of Canada

D.R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1 Canada
Dingsheng Technologies, Beijing 100085, China

Abstract

Can we determine a high resolution protein structure quickly, say, in a week? I will show this is possible by the current technologies together with new computational tools discussed in this article. We have three potential paths to explore:

 

 

 

 

  • X-ray crystallography. While this method has produced the most protein structures in the PDB (Protein Data Bank), the nasty trial-and-error crystallization step remains to be an inhibitive obstacle.
  • NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) spectroscopy. While the NMR experiments are relatively easy to do, the interpretation of the NMR data for structure calculation takes several months on average.
  • In silico protein structure prediction. Can we actually predict high resolution structures consistently? If the predicted models remain to be labeled as ``predicted'', and these structures still need to be experimentally verified by the wet lab methods, then this method at best can serve only as a screening tool.
    I investigate the question of ``quick protein structure determination'' from a computer scientist point of view and actually answer the more relevant question ``what can a computer scientist effectively contribute to this goal''.

     

     

     

     

     

  • Keywords automated NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance)    protein structure determination    algorithms  
    Received: 2009-10-13 Accepted: 2009-11-16 Online:  
    DOI:
    Fund:

    This work was partially supported by the National High Tech Research and Development 863 Program under Grant No. 2008AA02Z313 from China's Ministry of Science and Technology, Canada's NSERC under Grant No. OGP0046506, Canada Research Chair Program, an NSERC Collaborative Grant, and Ontario's Premier's Discovery Award.

    Email: mli@uwaterloo.ca
    About author(s):
    Ming Li is a Canada research chair in bioinformatics and a University Professor at the University of Waterloo. He is a fellow of Royal Society of Canada, ACM, and IEEE. He is a recipient of E.W.R. Steacie Fellowship Award in 1996, and the 2001 Killam Fellowship. Together with Paul Vitanyi he has pioneered the applications of Kolmogorov complexity and co-authored the book ``An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications''. His research interests recently include protein structure determination and the Internet search engine.

    Other similar articles
    1.HUANG Xiong; LI wei;.On k-Positive Satisfiability Problem[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 1999,14(4): 309-313
    2.Ma Jun; Ma Shaohan;.Efficient Parallel Algorithms for Some Graph Theory Problems[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 1993,8(4): 76-80
    3.Issam W. Damaj.Higher-Level Hardware Synthesis of the KASUMI Algorithm[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2007,22(1): 60-70
    4.Katerina Asdre and Stavros D. Nikolopoulos.P-Tree Structures and Event Horizon: Efficient Event-Set Implementations[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2006,21(1): 19-26
    5.Xue Jinyun;.Formal Derivation of Graph AlgorithmicPrograms Using Partition-and-Recur[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 1998,13(6): 553-561
    6.Jie Tian, Liang Li, and Xin Yang.Fingerprint-Based Identity Authentication and Digital Media Protection in Network Environment[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2006,21(5): 861-870
    7.Awadhesh Kumar Singh and Anup Kumar Bandyopadhyay.Verifying Mutual Exclusion and Liveness Properties with Split Preconditions[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2004,19(6): 0-0
    8.Benjamin W. Wah[1] and Zhe Wu[2].Penalty Formulations and Trap-Avoidance Strategies for Solving Hard Satisfiability Problems[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2005,20(1): 0-0
    9.Jin-Yi Cai, and Hong Zhu.Progress in Computational Complexity Theory[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2005,20(6): 735-750
    10.Minghui Jiang and Joel Gillespie.Engineering the Divide-and-Conquer Closest Pair Algorithm[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2007,22(4): 532-540
    11.Xiao-Dong Wang and Ying-Jie Wu.An Improved HEAPSORT Algorithm with n log n - 0.788928n Comparisons in the Worst Case[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2007,22(6): 898-903
    12.Ehab Z. Elfeky, Ruhul A. Sarker, and Daryl L. Essam.Analyzing the Simple Ranking and Selection Process for Constrained Evolutionary Optimization[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2008,23(1): 19-34
    13.LIN Huimin (林惠民).A Graphical u-Calculus and Local Model Checking[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2002,17(6): 0-0
    14.Paola Bonizzoni , Gianluca Della Vedova , Riccardo Dondi and Jing Li .The Haplotyping Problem: An Overview of Computational Models and Solutions[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 2003,18(6): 0-0

    Copyright 2008 by Journal of Computer Science and Technology