|
›› 2013,Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 1117-1126.doi: 10.1007/s11390-013-1402-9
所属专题: Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition
• Special Section on Selected Paper from NPC 2011 • 上一篇
Hong-Ling Wang (王红玲), Member, CCF, and Guo-Dong Zhou* (周国栋), Senior Member, CCF, Member, ACM, IEEE
Hong-Ling Wang (王红玲), Member, CCF, and Guo-Dong Zhou* (周国栋), Senior Member, CCF, Member, ACM, IEEE
本文探索卷积树核方法进行中文名词性谓词语义角色标注,特别是提出了一种新的句法解析树表示形式,即依存驱动成分句法树。该结构结合了成分句法树和依存树两者的优点,将依存关系加入到成分句法树结构上,具体做法是使用依存关系类型来替代成分句法树中的短语结构类型。这种依存驱动成分句法树不仅保留了依存句法树中的依存关系信息,还保留了成分句法树的层次结构。基于此结构,本文设计了多种方案获取多种必要信息,如名词性谓语与候选论元之间的最短路径、支持动词和候选论元的头词等信息,极大减少了句法树上存在的多余/噪音信息。最后,本文使用了一个卷积树核函数来计算两棵句法树之间的相似性。为了公平比较,本文基于此结构实现了基于特征的语义角色标注。在中文NomBank语料上的实验结果表明,本文采用的树核方法在基于本文提出的句法结构上性能明显好于其他树核函数,与目前最好的基于特征方法的性能相当。这表明了这种新型句法结构的有效性,一方面能够有效地在成分句法树上表示依存信息,另一方面树核方法能够有效地使用该结构。这也说明了使用树核方法进行语义角色标注具有竞争力,可以作为特征方法的有力补充。
[1] Surdeanu M, Harabagiu S, Williams J, Aarseth P. Using predicate-argument structures for information extraction. In Proc. the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, July 2003, Vol.1, pp.8-15.[2] Narayanan S, Harabagiu S. Question answering based on semantic structures. In Proc. the 20th Int. Conf. Computational Linguistics, August 2004, Article No. 693.[3] Ponzetto S P, Strube M. Semantic role labeling for coreference resolution. In Proc. the 11th EACL, April 2006, pp.143-146.[4] Persson J, Johansson R, Nugues P. Text categorization using predicate-argument structures. In Proc. the 17th NODALIDA, May 2009, pp.142-149.[5] Moschitti A, Pighin D, Basili R. Tree kernels for semantic role labeling. Computational Linguistics, 2008, 34(2): 193-224.[6] Moschitti A. Efficient convolution kernels for dependency and constituent syntactic trees. In Proc. the 17th ECML, September 2006, pp.318-329.[7] Punyakanok V, Roth D, Yih W. The necessity of syntactic parsing for semantic role labeling. In Proc. the 19th IJCAI, July 30-August 5, 2005, pp.1117-1123.[8] Moschitti A, Bejan C A. A semantic kernel for predicate argument classification. In Proc. the 8th CoNLL, May 2004, pp.17-24.[9] Moschitti A. A study on convolution kernels for shallow semantic parsing. In Proc. the 42nd ACL, July 2004, Article No. 335.[10] Moschitti A, Pighin D, Basili R. Tree kernel engineering in semantic role labeling systems. In Proc. the 11st EACL, April 2006, pp.49-56.[11] Zhang M, Che W X, Aw A, Tan C L, Zhou G D, Liu T, Li S. A grammar-driven convolution tree kernel for semantic role classification. In Proc. the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, June 2007, pp.200-207.[12] Zhou G D, Li J H, Fan J X, Zhu Q M. Tree kernel-based semantic role labeling with enriched parse tree structure. Information Processing and Management, 2011, 47(3): 349-362.[13] Hacioglu K. Semantic role labeling using dependency trees. In Proc. the 20th COLING, August 2004, Article No. 1273.[14] Johansson R, Nugues P. Dependency-based semantic role labeling of PropBank. In Proc. the 5th EMNLP, Oct. 2008, pp.69-78.[15] Collins M, Duffy N. New ranking algorithms for parsing and tagging: Kernels over discrete structures, and the voted perception. In Proc. the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, July 2002, pp.263-270.[16] Che W X, Zhang M, Liu T et al. A hybrid convolution tree kernel for semantic role labeling. In Proc. the 44th ACL, July 2006, pp.73-80.[17] Croce D, Moschitti A, Basili R, Palmer M. Verb classification using distributional similarity in syntactic and semantic structures. In Proc. the 50th ACL, July 2012, pp.263-272.[18] Nguyen T T, Moschitti A, Riccardi G. Convolution kernels on constituent, dependency and sequential structures for relation extraction. In Proc. the 2009 Conf. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Aug. 2009, Vol.3, pp.13781387.[19] Croce D, Moschitti A, Basili R. Semantic convolution kernels over dependency trees: Smoothed partial tree kernel. In Proc. the 20th CIKM, October 2011, pp.2013-2016.[20] Johansson R, Moschitti A. Syntactic and semantic structure for opinion expression detection. In Proc. the 14th CoNLL, July 2010, pp.67-76.[21] Kong F, Zhou G D, Qian L H et al. Dependency-driven anaphoricity determination for coreference resolution. In Proc. the 23rd Int. Conf. Computational Linguistics, August 2010, pp.599-607.[22] Sun HL, Jurafsky D. Shallow semantic parsing of Chinese. In Proc. the 2004 NAACL, May 2004, pp.249-256.[23] Pradhan S, Sun H L, Ward W, Martin H J, Jurafsky D. Parsing arguments of nominalizations in English and Chinese. In Proc. HLT-NAACL, May 2004, pp.141-144.[24] Xue N W, Palmer M. Annotating the propositions in the Penn Chinese Treebank. In Proc. the 2nd SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, July 2003, Vol.17, pp.47-54.[25] Xue N W. Annotating the predicate-argument structure of Chinese nominalizations. In Proc. the 2006 LREC, May 2006, pp.1382-1387.[26] Xue N W. Palmer M. Automatic semantic role labeling for Chinese verbs. In Proc. the 19th IJCAI, July 30-August 5,2005, pp.1160-1165.[27] Xue N W. Semantic role labeling of nominalized predicates in Chinese. In Proc. the 2006 HLT-NAACL, June 2006, pp.431438.[28] Xue N W. Labeling Chinese predicates with semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 2008, 34(2): 225-255.[29] Li J H, Zhou G D, Zhao H, Zhu Q M, Qian P D. Improving nominal SRL in Chinese language with verbal SRL information and automatic predicate recognition. In Proc. EMNLP, August 2009, Vol.3, pp.1280-1288.[30] Li S Q, Lu Q, Zhao T J, Liu P Y, Li H J. Combing constituent and dependency syntactic views for Chinese semantic role labeling. In Proc. the 23rd COLING, August 2010, pp.665-673.[31] Bjørkelund A, Hafdell L, Nugues P. Multilingual semantic role labeling. In Proc. the 13th CoNLL, June 2009, pp.43-48.[32] Meza-Ruiz I, Riedel S. Multilingual semantic role labeling with Markov logic. In Proc. the 13th CoNLL, June 2009, pp.85-90. |
No related articles found! |
|
版权所有 © 《计算机科学技术学报》编辑部 本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn 总访问量: |