| [1] OMG. UML profile for MARTE: Modeling and analysis ofreal-time embedded systems. Version 1.0, formal/2009-11-02,2009, http://www.omg.org/spec/MARTE/1.0/.[2] Baresi L, Pezze M. On formalizing UML with high-level Petrinets. In Concurrent Object-Oriented Programming and PetriNets, Springer Verlag, 2001, pp.276-304.[3] Crane M, Dingel J. Towards a formal account of a foundationalsubset for executable UML models. In Proc. the 11thInternational Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languagesand Systems, October 2008, pp.675-689.[4] David A, Möller M, Yi W. Formal verification of UML statechartswith real-time extensions. In Proc. the 5th Int.Conf. Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering,Apr. 2002, pp.218-232.[5] Latella D, Majzik I, Massink M. Towards a formal operationalsemantics of UML statechart diagrams. In Proc. the3rd International Conference on Formal Methods for OpenObject-Based Distributed Systems, March 1999, p.465.[6] Andr′e C, Mallet F, Peraldi-Frati M. A multiform time approachto real-time system modeling: Application to an automotivesystem. In Proc. the International Symposium onIndustrial Embedded Systems, July 2007, pp.234-241.[7] Mallet F, de Simone F. MARTE: A profile for RT/E systemsmodeling, analysis-and simulation? In Proc. the 1st Simutools,June 2008, Article No.43.[8] OMG. UML profile for MARTE: Modeling and analysis ofreal-time embedded systems. Version 1.1, formal/2011-06-02,2011, http://www.omg.org/spec/MARTE/1.1.[9] Alur R, Dill D. A theory of timed automata. TheoreticalComputer Science, 1994, 126(2): 183-235.[10] Berthomieu B, Ribet P, Vernadat F. The tool TINA-Construction of abstract state spaces for petri nets and timepetri nets. International Journal of Production Research,2004, 42(14): 2741-2756.[11] Fecher H, Schönborn J, Kyas M, de Roever W. 29 new unclaritiesin the semantics of UML 2.0 state machines. In Proc. the7th International Conference on Formal Methods and SoftwareEngineering, November 2005, pp.52-65.[12] OMG. OMG unified modeling languageTM (OMG UML), superstructure.Version 2.2, 2009, http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.2/Superstructure.[13] Mikk E, Lakhnechi Y, Siegel M. Hierarchical automata asmodel for statecharts. In Proc. the 3rd Asian Computing ScienceConf. Advance in Computing Science, December 1997,pp.181-196.[14] Behrmann G, David A, Larsen K. A tutorial on UPPAAL. InProc. the International Conference on Formal Methods forthe Design of Real-time Systems, July 2004, pp.33-35.[15] Lamport L. Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributedsystem. Communications of the ACM, 1978, 21(7):558-565.[16] Mallet F, Andr′e C. On the semantics of UML/MARTEclock constraints. In Proc. the Int. Symp.Object/Component/Service-Oriented Real-Time DistributedComputing, Mar. 2009, pp.305-312.[17] Ge N, Pantel M. Time properties dedicated semantics forUML-MARTE safety critical real-time system verification. InProc. the 8th European Conference on Modelling Foundationsand Applications, July 2012, pp.25-39.[18] Crane M, Dingel J. On the semantics of UML state machines:Categorization and comparision. Technical Report 2005-501,Queen’s University, 2005.[19] Harel D, Naamad A. The STATEMATE semantics of statecharts.ACM Transactions on Software Engineering andMethodology, 1996, 5(4): 293-333.[20] David A, Möller M. From HUPPAAL to UPPAAL: A translationfrom hierarchical timed automata to flat timed automata.Technical Report, University of Aarhus, 2001.[21] Giese H, Burmester S. Real-time statechart semantics. TechnicalReport TR-RI-03-239, University of Paderborn, 2003.[22] Akshay S, Bollig B, Gastin P, Mukund M, Kumar K N. Distributedtimed automata with independently evolving clocks.In Proc. the 19th International Conference on ConcurrencyTheory, August 2008, pp.82-97.[23] Hu Z, Shatz S. Explicit modeling of semantics associated withcomposite states in UML statecharts. Automated SoftwareEngineering, 2006, 13(4): 423-467.[24] Hölscher K, Ziemann P, GogollaM. On translating UML modelsinto graph transformation systems. Journal of Visual Languages& Computing, 2006, 17(1): 78-105.[25] Kong J, Zhang K, Dong J, Xu D. Specifying behavioral semanticsof UML diagrams through graph transformations.Journal of Systems and Software, 2009, 82(2): 292-306.[26] Bindelli S, Di Nitto E, Furia C et al. Using compositionalityto formally model and analyze systems built of a high numberof components. In Proc. the 15th Int. Conf. Eng. ofComplex Computer Systems, Mar. 2010, pp.85-94. |