›› 2016, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 185-197.doi: 10.1007/s11390-016-1620-z

Special Issue: Data Management and Data Mining

• Data Management and Data Mining • Previous Articles     Next Articles

RiMOM-IM:A Novel Iterative Framework for Instance Matching

Chao Shao1, Lin-Mei Hu1*, Juan-Zi Li1, Member, CCF, Zhi-Chun Wang2, Member, CCF Tonglee Chung1, and Jun-Bo Xia1   

  1. 1 Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
    2 College of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2014-10-30 Revised:2015-07-17 Online:2016-01-05 Published:2016-01-05
  • Contact: Lin-Mei Hu E-mail:hulinmei1991@gmail.com
  • About author:Chao Shao is a master student in the Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing. His research interests include instance matching, semantic web, text mining, and big data.t
  • Supported by:

    The work is supported by the National Basic Research 973 Program of China under Grant No. 2014CB340504, the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the French National Research Agency under Grant No. 61261130588, the Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program under Grant No. 20131089256, the Science and Technology Support Program of China under Grant No. 2014BAK04B00 and the Tsinghua University and National University of Singapore Extreme Search Joint Centre.

Instance matching, which aims at discovering the correspondences of instances between knowledge bases, is a fundamental issue for the ontological data sharing and integration in Semantic Web. Although considerable instance matching approaches have already been proposed, how to ensure both high accuracy and efficiency is still a big challenge when dealing with large-scale knowledge bases. This paper proposes an iterative framework, RiMOM-IM (RiMOM-Instance Matching). The key idea behind this framework is to fully utilize the distinctive and available matching information to improve the efficiency and control the error propagation. We participated in the 2013 and 2014 competition of Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI), and our system was ranked the first. Furthermore, the experiments on previous OAEI datasets also show that our system performs the best.

[1] Shvaiko P, Euzenat J. Ontology matching:State of the art and future challenges. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 2013, 25(1):158-176.

[2] Ferrara A, Nikolov A, Noessner J et al. Evaluation of instance matching tools:The experience of OAEI. Web Smantics:Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2013, 21:49-60.

[3] Bellahsene Z, Bonifati A, Rahm E. Schema Matching and Mapping. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011.

[4] Huber J, Sztyler T, Noessner J et al. CODI:Combinatorial optimization for data integration-Results for OAEI 2011. In Proc. the 6th International Workshop on Ontology Matching, Oct. 2011, pp.134-141.

[5] Volz J, Bizer C, Gaedke M, Kobilarov G. Discovering and maintaining links on the web data. In Proc. the 8th International Semantic Web Conference, Oct. 2009, pp.650-665.

[6] Suchanek F M, Abiteboul S, Senellart P. PARIS:Probabilistic alignment of relations, instances, and schema. PVLDB, 2011, 5(3):157-168

[7] Lacoste-Julien S, Palla K, Davies A, Kasneci G, Graepel T, Ghahramani Z. SIGMa:Simple greedy matching for aligning large knowledge bases. In Proc. the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Aug. 2013, pp.572-580.

[8] Li J, Tang J, Li Y, Luo Q. RiMOM:A dynamic multistrategy ontology alignment framework. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 2009, 21(8):1218-1232.

[9] Böhm C, de Melo G, Naumann F, Weikum G. LINDA:Distributed web-of-data-scale entity matching. In Proc. the 21st CIKM, Oct.29-Nov.2, 2012, pp.2104-2108.

[10] Diallo G, Ba M. Effective method for large scale ontology matching. In Proc. the 5th SWAT4LS, Nov. 2012.

[11] Li J, Wang Z, Zhang X et al. Large scale instance matching via multiple indexes and candidate selection. KnowledgeBased Systems, 2013, 50:112-120.

[12] Euzenat J, Valtchev P. Similarity-based ontology alignment in OWL-lite. In Proc. the 16th ECAI, August 2004, pp.333- 337.

[13] Jean-Mary Y R, Shironoshita E P, Kabuka M R. Ontology matching with semantic verification. Web Semantics:Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2009, 7(3):235-251.

[14] Dragisic Z, Eckert K, Euzenat J et al. Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2014. In Proc. the 9th International Workshop on Ontology Matching, Oct. 2014, pp.61-104.

[15] Grau B C, Dragisic Z, Eckert K et al. Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2013. In Proc. the 8th International Workshop on Ontology Matching, Oct. 2013, pp.61-100.

[16] Euzenat J, Ferrara A, van Hage W R et al. Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2011. In Proc. the 6th Internaitonal Workshop on Ontology Matching, Oct. 2011.

[17] Euzenat J, Ferrara A, Meilicke C et al. Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2010. In Proc. the 5th International Workshop on Ontology Matching, Nov. 2010.

[18] Do H H, Rahm E. COMA:A system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In Proc. the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Aug. 2002, pp.610-621.

[19] Nguyen K, Ichise R, Le B. SLINT:A schema-independent linked data interlinking system. In Proc. the 7th Internaitonal Workshop on Ontology Matching, Nov. 2012.

[20] Hu W, Qu Y. Falcon-AO:A practical ontology matching system. Web Semantics:Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2008, 6(3):237-239

[21] Pirrò G, Talia D. UFOme:An ontology mapping system with strategy prediction capabilities. Data Knowl. Eng., 2010, 69(5):444-471.

[22] Albagli S, Ben-Eliyahu-Zohary R, Shimony S E. Markov network based ontology matching. InProc. the 21st IJCAI, Jul. 2009, pp.1884-1889.

[23] Melnik S, Garcia-Molina H, Rahm E. Similarity flooding:A versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching. In Proc. the 18th ICDE, Feb.26-Mar.1, 2002, pp.117-128.

[24] Ehrig M, Staab S, Sure Y. Bootstrapping ontology alignment methods with APFEL. In Proc. the 18th WWW (Special Interest Tracks and Posters), May 2005, pp.1148- 1149.

[25] Doan A, Madhavan J, Dhamankar R, Domingos P, Halevy A Y. Learning to match ontologies on the semantic web. VLDB J, 2003, 12(4):303-319.

[26] Niepert M, Meilicke C, Stuckenschmidt H. A probabilisticlogical framework for ontology matching. In Proc. the 24th AAAI, Jul. 2010.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Liu Mingye; Hong Enyu;. Some Covering Problems and Their Solutions in Automatic Logic Synthesis Systems[J]. , 1986, 1(2): 83 -92 .
[2] Chen Shihua;. On the Structure of (Weak) Inverses of an (Weakly) Invertible Finite Automaton[J]. , 1986, 1(3): 92 -100 .
[3] Gao Qingshi; Zhang Xiang; Yang Shufan; Chen Shuqing;. Vector Computer 757[J]. , 1986, 1(3): 1 -14 .
[4] Chen Zhaoxiong; Gao Qingshi;. A Substitution Based Model for the Implementation of PROLOG——The Design and Implementation of LPROLOG[J]. , 1986, 1(4): 17 -26 .
[5] Huang Heyan;. A Parallel Implementation Model of HPARLOG[J]. , 1986, 1(4): 27 -38 .
[6] Min Yinghua; Han Zhide;. A Built-in Test Pattern Generator[J]. , 1986, 1(4): 62 -74 .
[7] Lu Xuemiao;. On the Complexity of Induction of Structural Descriptions[J]. , 1987, 2(1): 12 -21 .
[8] Tang Tonggao; Zhao Zhaokeng;. Stack Method in Program Semantics[J]. , 1987, 2(1): 51 -63 .
[9] Min Yinghua;. Easy Test Generation PLAs[J]. , 1987, 2(1): 72 -80 .
[10] Zhu Hong;. Some Mathematical Properties of the Functional Programming Language FP[J]. , 1987, 2(3): 202 -216 .

ISSN 1000-9000(Print)

         1860-4749(Online)
CN 11-2296/TP

Home
Editorial Board
Author Guidelines
Subscription
Journal of Computer Science and Technology
Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
P.O. Box 2704, Beijing 100190 P.R. China
Tel.:86-10-62610746
E-mail: jcst@ict.ac.cn
 
  Copyright ©2015 JCST, All Rights Reserved