SCIE, EI, Scopus, INSPEC, DBLP, CSCD, etc.
Citation: | Zhi-Xing Li, Yue Yu, Gang Yin, Tao Wang, Huai-Min Wang. What Are They Talking About? Analyzing Code Reviews in Pull-Based Development Model[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2017, 32(6): 1060-1075. DOI: 10.1007/s11390-017-1783-2 |
[1] |
Barr E T, Bird C, Rigby P C, Hindle A, German D M, Devanbu P. Cohesive and isolated development with branches. In Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, De Lara J, Zisman A (eds.), Springer, 2012, pp.316-331.
|
[2] |
Gousios G, Pinzger M, van Deursen A. An exploratory study of the pull-based software development model. In Proc. the 36th Int. Conf. Software Engineering, May 31-June 7, 2014, pp.345-355.
|
[3] |
Gousios G, Zaidman A, Storey M A, van Deursen A. Work practices and challenges in pull-based development:The integrator's perspective. In Proc. the 37th Int. Conf. Software Engineering, May 2015, pp.358-368.
|
[4] |
Gousios G, Storey M A, Bacchelli A. Work practices and challenges in pull-based development:The contributor's perspective. In Proc. the 38th Int. Conf. Software Engineering, May 2016, pp.285-296.
|
[5] |
Tsay J, Dabbish L, Herbsleb J. Let's talk about it:Evaluating contributions through discussion in GitHub. In Proc. the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT Int. Symp. Foundations of Software Engineering, November 2014, pp.144-154.
|
[6] |
Marlow J, Dabbish L, Herbsleb J. Impression formation in online peer production:Activity traces and personal profiles in GitHub. In Proc. Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, February 2013, pp.117-128.
|
[7] |
Yu Y, Wang H M, Yin G, Wang T. Reviewer recommendation for pull-requests in GitHub:What can we learn from code review and bug assignment? Information and Software Technology, 2016, 74:204-218.
|
[8] |
Tsay J, Dabbish L, Herbsleb J. Influence of social and technical factors for evaluating contribution in GitHub. In Proc. the 36th Int. Conf. Software Engineering, May 31-June 7, 2014, pp.356-366.
|
[9] |
Yu Y, Yin G, Wang T, Yang C, Wang H M. Determinants of pull-based development in the context of continuous integration. Science China Information Sciences, 2016, 59:080104.
|
[10] |
Thongtanunam P, McIntosh S, Hassan A E, Iida H. Investigating code review practices in defective files:An empirical study of the QT system. In Proc. the 12th Working Conf. Mining Software Repositories, May 2015, pp.168-179.
|
[11] |
Storey M A, Singer L, Cleary B, Filho F F, Zagalsky A. The (r)evolution of social media in software engineering. In Proc. the Future of Software Engineering, May 31-June 7, 2014, pp.100-116.
|
[12] |
Zhu J X, Zhou M H, Mockus A. Effectiveness of code contribution:From patch-based to pull-request-based tools. In Proc. the 24th ACM SIGSOFT Int. Symp. Foundations of Software Engineering, November 2016, pp.871-882.
|
[13] |
De Lima M L, Soares D M, Plastino A, Murta L. Developers assignment for analyzing pull requests. In Proc. the 30th Annual ACM Symp. Applied Computing, April 2015, pp.1567-1572.
|
[14] |
van der Veen E, Gousios G, Zaidman A. Automatically prioritizing pull requests. In Proc. the 12th Working Conf. Mining Software Repositories, May 2015, pp.357-361.
|
[15] |
Bacchelli A, Bird C. Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review. In Proc. the 35th Int. Conf. Software Engineering, May 2013, pp.712-721.
|
[16] |
Rigby P C, Bacchelli A, Gousios G, Mukadam M. A mixed methods approach to mining code review data:Examples and a study of multi-commit reviews and pull requests. In The Art and Science of Analyzing Software Data, Bird C, Menzies T, Zimmermann T (eds.), Morgan Kaufmann, 2015, pp.231-255.
|
[17] |
Vasilescu B, Yu Y, Wang H M, Devanbu P, Filkov V. Quality and productivity outcomes relating to continuous integration in GitHub. In Proc. the 10th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering, August 30-September 4, 2015, pp.805-816.
|
[18] |
Mcintosh S, Kamei Y, Adams B, Hassan A E. An empirical study of the impact of modern code review practices on software quality. Empirical Software Engineering, 2016, 21(5):2146-2189.
|
[19] |
Fagan M. Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development. In Software Pioneers, Broy M, Denert E (eds.), Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp.575-607.
|
[20] |
Aurum A, Petersson H, Wohlin C. State-of-the-art:Software inspections after 25 years. Sofware:Testing Verification and Reliability, 2002, 12(3):133-154.
|
[21] |
Rigby P, Cleary B, Painchaud F, Storey M A, German D. Contemporary peer review in action:Lessons from open source development. IEEE Software, 2012, 29(6):56-61.
|
[22] |
Rigby P C, Storey M A. Understanding broadcast based peer review on open source software projects. In Proc. the 33rd Int. Conf. Software Engineering, May 2011, pp.541-550.
|
[23] |
Baum T, Liskin O, Niklas K, Schneider K. Factors influencing code review processes in industry. In Proc. the 24th ACM SIGSOFT Int. Symp. Foundations of Software Engineering, November 2016, pp.85-96.
|
[24] |
Mcintosh S, Kamei Y, Adams B, Hassan A E. The impact of code review coverage and code review participation on software quality:A case study of the QT, VTK, and ITK projects. In Proc. the 11th Working Conf. Mining Software Repositories, May 31-June 1, 2014, pp.192-201.
|
[25] |
Thongtanunam P, Mcintosh S, Hassan A E, Iida H. Review participation in modern code review. Empirical Software Engineering, 2016, 22(2):768-817.
|
[26] |
Zhang Y, Wang H M, Yin G, Wang T, Yu Y. Social media in GitHub:The role of@-mention in assisting software development. Science China Information Sciences, 2017, 60:032102.
|
[27] |
Baeza-Yates R A, Ribeiro-Neto B. Modern Information Retrieval:The Concepts and Technology Behind Search (2nd edition). Addison Wesley, 2011.
|
[28] |
Zhou Y, Tong Y X, Gu R H, Gall H. Combining text mining and data mining for bug report classification. Journal of Software:Evolution and Process, 2016, 28(3):150-176.
|
[29] |
Shah S K. Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science, 2006, 52(7):1000-1014.
|